Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
medrxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.03.11.22271912

ABSTRACT

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presents an urgent threat to global health. Prediction models that accurately estimate mortality risk in hospitalized patients could assist medical staff in treatment and allocating limited resources. Aims: To externally validate two promising previously published risk scores that predict in-hospital mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods: Two cohorts were available; a cohort of 1028 patients admitted to one of nine hospitals in Lombardy, Italy (the Lombardy cohort) and a cohort of 432 patients admitted to a hospital in Leiden, the Netherlands (the Leiden cohort). The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. All patients were adult and tested COVID-19 PCR-positive. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed. Results: The C-statistic of the 4C mortality score was good in the Lombardy cohort (0.85, 95CI: 0.82-0.89) and in the Leiden cohort (0.87, 95CI: 0.80-0.94). Model calibration was acceptable in the Lombardy cohort but poor in the Leiden cohort due to the model systematically overpredicting the mortality risk for all patients. The C-statistic of the CURB-65 score was good in the Lombardy cohort (0.80, 95CI: 0.75-0.85) and in the Leiden cohort (0.82, 95CI: 0.76-0.88). The mortality rate in the CURB-65 development cohort was much lower than the mortality rate in the Lombardy cohort. A similar but less pronounced trend was found for patients in the Leiden cohort. Conclusion: Although performances did not differ greatly, the 4C mortality score showed the best performance. However, because of quickly changing circumstances, model recalibration may be necessary before using the 4C mortality score.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
2.
medrxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.02.04.22270433

ABSTRACT

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presents an urgent threat to global health. Identification of predictors of poor outcomes will assist medical staff in treatment and allocating limited healthcare resources. Aims The primary aim was to study the value of D-dimer as a predictive marker for in-hospital mortality. Methods This was a cohort study. The study population consisted of hospitalized patients (age >18 years), who were diagnosed with COVID-19 based on real-time PCR at 9 hospitals during the first COVID-19 wave in Lombardy, Italy (Feb-May 2020). The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Information was obtained from patient records. Statistical analyses were performed using a Fine-Gray competing risk survival model. Model discrimination was assessed using Harrells C-index and model calibration was assessed using a calibration plot. Results Out of 1049 patients, 501 patients had evaluable data. Of these 501 patients, 96 died. The cumulative incidence of in-hospital mortality within 30 days was 20% (95CI: 16%-23%), and the majority of deaths occurred within the first 10 days. A prediction model containing D-dimer as the only predictor had a C-index of 0.66 (95%CI: 0.61-0.71). Overall calibration of the model was very poor. The addition of D-dimer to a model containing age, sex and co-morbidities as predictors did not lead to any meaningful improvement in either the C-index or the calibration plot. Conclusion The predictive value of D-dimer alone was moderate, and the addition of D-dimer to a simple model containing basic clinical characteristics did not lead to any improvement in model performance.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
3.
Frauke Degenhardt; David Ellinghaus; Simonas Juzenas; Jon Lerga-Jaso; Mareike Wendorff; Douglas Maya-Miles; Florian Uellendahl-Werth; Hesham ElAbd; Malte C. Ruehlemann; Jatin Arora; Onur oezer; Ole Bernt Lenning; Ronny Myhre; May Sissel Vadla; Eike Matthias Wacker; Lars Wienbrandt; Aaron Blandino Ortiz; Adolfo de Salazar; Adolfo Garrido Chercoles; Adriana Palom; Agustin Ruiz; Alberto Mantovani; Alberto Zanella; Aleksander Rygh Holten; Alena Mayer; Alessandra Bandera; Alessandro Cherubini; Alessandro Protti; Alessio Aghemo; Alessio Gerussi; Alexander Popov; Alfredo Ramirez; Alice Braun; Almut Nebel; Ana Barreira; Ana Lleo; Ana Teles; Anders Benjamin Kildal; Andrea Biondi; Andrea Ganna; Andrea Gori; Andreas Glueck; Andreas Lind; Anke Hinney; Anna Carreras Nolla; Anna Ludovica Fracanzani; Annalisa Cavallero; Anne Ma Dyrhol-Riise; Antonella Ruello; Antonio Julia; Antonio Muscatello; Antonio Pesenti; Antonio Voza; Ariadna Rando-Segura; Aurora Solier; Beatriz Cortes; Beatriz Mateos; Beatriz Nafria-Jimenez; Benedikt Schaefer; Bjoern Jensen; Carla Bellinghausen; Carlo Maj; Carlos Ferrando; Carmen de la Horrra; Carmen Quereda; Carsten Skurk; Charlotte Thibeault; Chiara Scollo; Christian Herr; Christoph D. Spinner; Christoph Lange; Cinzia Hu; Clara Lehmann; Claudio Cappadona; Clinton Azuure; - COVICAT study group; - Covid-19 Aachen Study (COVAS); Cristiana Bianco; Cristina Sancho; Dag Arne Lihaug Hoff; Daniela Galimberti; Daniele Prati; David Haschka; David Jimenez; David Pestana; David Toapanta; Elena Azzolini; Elio Scarpini; Elisa T. Helbig; Eloisa Urrechaga; Elvezia Maria Paraboschi; Emanuele Pontali; Enric Reverter; Enrique J. Calderon; Enrique Navas; Erik Solligard; Ernesto Contro; Eunate Arana; Federico Garcia; Felix Garcia Sanchez; Ferruccio Ceriotti; Filippo Martinelli-Boneschi; Flora Peyvandi; Florian Kurth; Francesco Blasi; Francesco Malvestiti; Francisco J. Medrano; Francisco Mesonero; Francisco Rodriguez-Frias; Frank Hanses; Fredrik Mueller; Giacomo Bellani; Giacomo Grasselli; Gianni Pezzoli; Giorgio Costantino; Giovanni Albano; Giuseppe Bellelli; Giuseppe Citerio; Giuseppe Foti; Giuseppe Lamorte; Holger Neb; Ilaria My; Ingo Kurth; Isabel Hernandez; Isabell Pink; Itziar de Rojas; Ivan Galvan-Femenia; Jan C. Holter; Jan Egil Egil Afset; Jan Heyckendorf; Jan Damas; Jan Kristian Rybniker; Janine Altmueller; Javier Ampuero; Jesus M. Banales; Joan Ramon Badia; Joaquin Dopazo; Jochen Schneider; Jonas Bergan; Jordi Barretina; Joern Walter; Jose Hernandez Quero; Josune Goikoetxea; Juan Delgado; Juan M. Guerrero; Julia Fazaal; Julia Kraft; Julia Schroeder; Kari Risnes; Karina Banasik; Karl Erik Mueller; Karoline I. Gaede; Koldo Garcia-Etxebarria; Kristian Tonby; Lars Heggelund; Laura Izquierdo-Sanchez; Laura Rachele Bettini; Lauro Sumoy; Leif Erik Sander; Lena J. Lippert; Leonardo Terranova; Lindokuhle Nkambule; Lisa Knopp; Lise Tuset Gustad; Lucia Garbarino; Luigi Santoro; Luis Tellez; Luisa Roade; Mahnoosh Ostadreza; Maider Intxausti; Manolis Kogevinas; Mar Riveiro-Barciela; Marc M. Berger; Mari E.K. Niemi; Maria A. Gutierrez-Stampa; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Maria Hernandez-Tejero; Maria J.G.T. Vehreschild; Maria Manunta; Mariella D'Angio; Marina Cazzaniga; Marit M. Grimsrud; Markus Cornberg; Markus M. Noethen; Marta Marquie; Massimo Castoldi; Mattia Cordioli; Maurizio Cecconi; Mauro D'Amato; Max Augustin; Melissa Tomasi; Merce Boada; Michael Dreher; Michael J. Seilmaier; Michael Joannidis; Michael Wittig; Michela Mazzocco; Miguel Rodriguez-Gandia; Natale Imaz Ayo; Natalia Blay; Natalia Chueca; Nicola Montano; Nicole Ludwig; Nikolaus Marx; Nilda Martinez; - Norwegian SARS-CoV-2 Study group; Oliver A. Cornely; Oliver Witzke; Orazio Palmieri; - Pa COVID-19 Study Group; Paola Faverio; Paolo Bonfanti; Paolo Tentorio; Pedro Castro; Pedro M. Rodrigues; Pedro Pablo Espana; Per Hoffmann; Philip Rosenstiel; Philipp Schommers; Phillip Suwalski; Raul de Pablo; Ricard Ferrer; Robert Bals; Roberta Gualtierotti; Rocio Gallego-Duran; Rosa Nieto; Rossana Carpani; Ruben Morilla; Salvatore Badalamenti; Sammra Haider; Sandra Ciesek; Sandra May; Sara Bombace; Sara Marsal; Sara Pigazzini; Sebastian Klein; Selina Rolker; Serena Pelusi; Sibylle Wilfling; Silvano Bosari; Soren Brunak; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Stefan Schreiber; Stefanie Heilmann-Heimbach; Stefano Aliberti; Stephan Ripke; Susanne Dudman; - The Humanitas COVID-19 Task Forse; - The Humanitas Gavazzeni COVID-19 Task Force; Thomas Bahmer; Thomas Eggermann; Thomas Illig; Thorsten Brenner; Torsten Feldt; Trine Folseraas; Trinidad Gonzalez Cejudo; Ulf Landmesser; Ulrike Protzer; Ute Hehr; Valeria Rimoldi; Vegard Skogen; Verena Keitel; Verena Kopfnagel; Vicente Friaza; Victor Andrade; Victor Moreno; Wolfgang Poller; Xavier Farre; Xiaomin Wang; Yascha Khodamoradi; Zehra Karadeniz; Anna Latiano; Siegfried Goerg; Petra Bacher; Philipp Koehler; Florian Tran; Heinz Zoller; Eva C. Schulte; Bettina Heidecker; Kerstin U. Ludwig; Javier Fernandez; Manuel Romero-Gomez; Agustin Albillos; Pietro Invernizzi; Maria Buti; Stefano Duga; Luis Bujanda; Johannes R. Hov; Tobias L. Lenz; Rosanna Asselta; Rafael de Cid; Luca Valenti; Tom H. Karlsen; Mario Caceres; Andre Franke.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.07.21.21260624

ABSTRACT

Due to the highly variable clinical phenotype of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), deepening the host genetic contribution to severe COVID-19 may further improve our understanding about underlying disease mechanisms. Here, we describe an extended GWAS meta-analysis of 3,260 COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure and 12,483 population controls from Italy, Spain, Norway and Germany, as well as hypothesis-driven targeted analysis of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region and chromosome Y haplotypes. We include detailed stratified analyses based on age, sex and disease severity. In addition to already established risk loci, our data identify and replicate two genome-wide significant loci at 17q21.31 and 19q13.33 associated with severe COVID-19 with respiratory failure. These associations implicate a highly pleiotropic ~0.9-Mb 17q21.31 inversion polymorphism, which affects lung function and immune and blood cell counts, and the NAPSA gene, involved in lung surfactant protein production, in COVID-19 pathogenesis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Insufficiency
4.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.04.13.21255117

ABSTRACT

Leveraging the unique biological resource based upon the initial COVID-19 patients in Policlinico di Milano (Italy), our study provides the first metabolic profile associated with a fatal outcome. The identification of potential predictive biomarkers offers a vital opportunity to employ metabolomics in a clinical setting as diagnostic tool of disease prognosis upon hospital admission.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
5.
researchsquare; 2020.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-50916.v1

ABSTRACT

The world is experiencing one of the most severe viral outbreaks in the last years, the pandemic infection by SARS-COV-2, causative agent of COVID-19 disease. The virus reached over 120 countries, with a total number of 6.5 million infected, and 320000 deaths. A deeper understanding of its genomic diversity is mandatory.We analyzed 21296 SARS-COV-2 reported sequences, defining the existence of recurrent haplotypes and their specific geographical distribution.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
6.
researchsquare; 2020.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-38422.v1

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND. Aim of the study is to evaluate the incidence of DVT in COVID-19 patients and its correlation with the severity of the disease and with clinical and laboratory findings.METHODS. 234 symptomatic patients with COVID-19, diagnosed according to the World Health Organization guidelines, were included in the study. The severity of the disease was classified as moderate, severe and critical. Doppler ultrasound (DUS) was performed in all patients. DUS findings, clinical, laboratory’s and therapeutic variables were investigated by contingency tables, Pearson chi square test and by Student T test and Fisher's exact test. ROC curve analysis was applied to study significant continuous variables.RESULTS. Overall incidence of DVT was 10.7% (25/234): 1.6% (1/60) among moderate cases, 13.8% (24/174) in severely and critically ill patients. Prolonged bedrest and intensive care unit admission were significantly associated with the presence of DVT (19.7%). Fraction of inspired oxygen, P/F ratio, respiratory rate, heparin administration, D-dimer, IL-6, ferritin and CRP showed correlation with DVT. CONCLUSIONS. DUS may be considered a useful and valid tool for early identification of DVT. In less severely affected patients, DUS as screening of DVT might be unnecessary. High rate of DVT found in severe patients and its correlation with respiratory parameters and some significant laboratory findings suggests that these can be used as a screening tool for patients who should be getting DUS.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Critical Illness
8.
David Ellinghaus; Frauke Degenhardt; Luis Bujanda; Maria Buti; Agustin Albillos; Pietro Invernizzi; Javier Fernandez; Daniele Prati; Guido Baselli; Rosanna Asselta; Marit Maehle Grimsrud; Chiara Milani; Fatima Aziz; Jan Kassens; Sandra May; Mareike Wendorff; Lars Wienbrandt; Florian Uellendahl-Werth; Tenghao Zheng; Xiaoli Yi; Raul de Pablo; Adolfo Garrido Chercoles; Adriana Palom; Alba-Estela Garcia-Fernandez; Francisco Rodriguez-Frias; Alberto Zanella; Alessandra Bandera; Alessandro Protti; Alessio Aghemo; Ana Lleo de Nalda; Andrea Biondi; Andrea Caballero-Garralda; Andrea Gori; Anja Tanck; Anna Latiano; Anna Ludovica Fracanzani; Anna Peschuck; Antonio Julia; Antonio Pesenti; Antonio Voza; David Jimenez; Beatriz Mateos; Beatriz Nafria Jimenez; Carmen Quereda; Claudio Angelini; Cristina Cea; Aurora Solier; David Pestana; Elena Sandoval; Elvezia Maria Paraboschi; Enrique Navas; Ferruccio Ceriotti; Filippo Martinelli-Boneschi; Flora Peyvandi; Francesco Blasi; Luis Tellez; Albert Blanco-Grau; Giacomo Grasselli; Giorgio Costantino; Giulia Cardamone; Giuseppe Foti; Serena Aneli; Hayato Kurihara; Hesham ElAbd; Ilaria My; Javier Martin; Jeanette Erdmann; Jose Ferrusquia-Acosta; Koldo Garcia-Etxebarria; Laura Izquierdo-Sanchez; Laura Rachele Bettini; Leonardo Terranova; Leticia Moreira; Luigi Santoro; Luigia Scudeller; Francisco Mesonero; Luisa Roade; Marco Schaefer; Maria Carrabba; Maria del Mar Riveiro Barciela; Maria Eloina Figuera Basso; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Maria Hernandez-Tejero; Marialbert Acosta-Herrera; Mariella D'Angio; Marina Baldini; Marina Cazzaniga; Martin Schulzky; Maurizio Cecconi; Michael Wittig; Michele Ciccarelli; Miguel Rodriguez-Gandia; Monica Bocciolone; Monica Miozzo; Nicole Braun; Nilda Martinez; Orazio Palmieri; Paola Faverio; Paoletta Preatoni; Paolo Bonfanti; Paolo Omodei; Paolo Tentorio; Pedro Castro; Pedro M. Rodrigues; Aaron Blandino Ortiz; Ricardo Ferrer Roca; Roberta Gualtierotti; Rosa Nieto; Salvatore Badalamenti; Sara Marsal; Giuseppe Matullo; Serena Pelusi; Valter Monzani; Tanja Wesse; Tomas Pumarola; Valeria Rimoldi; Silvano Bosari; Wolfgang Albrecht; Wolfgang Peter; Manuel Romero Gomez; Mauro D'Amato; Stefano Duga; Jesus M. Banales; Johannes Roksund Hov; Trine Folseraas; Luca Valenti; Andre Franke; Tom Hemming Karlsen.
medrxiv; 2020.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2020.05.31.20114991

ABSTRACT

Background. Respiratory failure is a key feature of severe Covid-19 and a critical driver of mortality, but for reasons poorly defined affects less than 10% of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Methods. We included 1,980 patients with Covid-19 respiratory failure at seven centers in the Italian and Spanish epicenters of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Europe (Milan, Monza, Madrid, San Sebastian and Barcelona) for a genome-wide association analysis. After quality control and exclusion of population outliers, 835 patients and 1,255 population-derived controls from Italy, and 775 patients and 950 controls from Spain were included in the final analysis. In total we analyzed 8,582,968 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and conducted a meta-analysis of both case-control panels. Results. We detected cross-replicating associations with rs11385942 at chromosome 3p21.31 and rs657152 at 9q34, which were genome-wide significant (P<5x10-8) in the meta-analysis of both study panels, odds ratio [OR], 1.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48 to 2.11; P=1.14x10-10 and OR 1.32 (95% CI, 1.20 to 1.47; P=4.95x10-8), respectively. Among six genes at 3p21.31, SLC6A20 encodes a known interaction partner with angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The association signal at 9q34 was located at the ABO blood group locus and a blood-group-specific analysis showed higher risk for A-positive individuals (OR=1.45, 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.75, P=1.48x10-4) and a protective effect for blood group O (OR=0.65, 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.79, P=1.06x10-5). Conclusions. We herein report the first robust genetic susceptibility loci for the development of respiratory failure in Covid-19. Identified variants may help guide targeted exploration of severe Covid-19 pathophysiology.


Subject(s)
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , COVID-19 , Respiratory Insufficiency
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL